<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="pmc">EA</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">EA</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EA</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Economic Affairs</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0424-2513</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">0976-4666</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AESSRA</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">EA-66-03-0363</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46852/0424-2513.3.2021.1</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research Paper</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Growth and Instability of Exports of Vegetable Products from India</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vasavada</surname><given-names>K.M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor001">*</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shiyani</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"/>
</contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="A1">Department of Agricultural Economics, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor001"><label>*</label>Corresponding author: <email>vasavadakairav39@gmail.com</email> (<bold>ORCID ID:</bold> 0000-0003-2641-2110<bold>)</bold></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>09</month>
<year iso-8601-date="2021">2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>66</volume>
<issue>03</issue>
<fpage>363</fpage>
<lpage>369</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2021-05-03">
<day>03</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="revised" iso-8601-date="2021-08-08">
<day>08</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2021-09-09">
<day>09</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; AESSRA, India</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>AESSRA, India</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="EA-66-03-0363.pdf"></self-uri>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>The study examined the growth and instability of vegetable products exports from India during 1996-97 to 2019-20. The results indicated positive and significant growth rates of Indian export for all the vegetable products under study for both the periods and also for the overall period. During overall period, onion fresh and cucumber registered positive and significant growth rates both in terms of export quantity and export value. However, export price of all the products declined significantly during the period of study. In terms of export quantity and value of vegetable products, none of the product showed low instability during the entire study period. In case of export price, low to medium instability was observed in majority of the vegetable products. By analyzing the growth and instability parameters during overall period none of the countries reported to have desirable situation of high growth with low instability in case of export quantity, value and price of vegetable products. The trade liberalization after the entry of WTO led to increase in competition between the countries which resulted into higher instability in the export of products.</p>
<sec>
<title>HIGHLIGHTS</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>It was concluded that rate of growth in export of vegetable products were found significant for all study period.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>None of the vegetable was found to be stable in the export during the entire period of study.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Vegetable products</kwd>
<kwd>export</kwd>
<kwd>growth rate</kwd>
<kwd>instability index</kwd>
<kwd>risk assessment</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<ref-count count="12"/>
<page-count count="7"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title/>
<p>India is considered as the fruit and vegetable basket of the world. It being a residence of wide variety of fruits and vegetables, holds a unique position in production figures among all the countries. The country has witnessed incredible progress in vegetables production, especially during the post green revolution period. Potato, tomato, onion, cabbage and cauliflower account for around 60% of the total vegetable production in the country. Per capita availability of vegetables in India is 400 gm/ person/day, which helps in fighting malnutrition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">Sahni and Kumari (2019)</xref>. India is the second largest producer of vegetables next only to China with an estimated production of 187.5 million tonnes, from an area of 25.87 million hectares in the year 2018-19 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">NHB (2019)</xref>.</p>
<p>The vegetables are important food crops playing greater role in food trade in India. India&#x2019;s diverse climatic conditions ensure availability of all varieties of fruits and vegetables for consumption throughout the year. Moreover, in India, where 20 per cent of the population is vegetarian, the need of fruits and vegetables in our diet is evident <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">Neeraj <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref>.</p>
<p>Total vegetable exports from India accounted for &#x20B9; 5419 crore during 2018-19, sharing 2.25 per cent of total agricultural exports and 0.23 per cent of total national exports <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3">CACP (2020)</xref>. India accounts nearly 16 per cent of the world production of vegetables and the productivity of vegetables in India is 17.3 t/ha, which is less than the world average productivity of 18.8 t/h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R7">IIVR (2020)</xref>. During 201819, India exported 3.33 million tonnes of vegetable products worth 5679 crore <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">NHB (2019)</xref>. This study aims to examine the growth and instability of export of vegetable products from India after the establishment of WTO.</p>
<p>Among various states in India, Uttar Pradesh (17%), West Bengal (16%), Madhya Pradesh (10%), Bihar (10%), Gujarat (7%), Maharashtra (7%), and Odisha (5%) are the major vegetables growing states <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">NHB (2019)</xref>. The major exporters of vegetable products (based on export value) in the world are USA, Japan, Germany, France, UK, Belgium and Netherland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6">FAO, 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
<p>The study is based on the time series data on export quantity, value and price which were compiled from the various public sources <italic>viz</italic>. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Export&#x2013;Import data of India and Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) for the period from 1996-97 to 2019-20. The data were categorized into three periods, <italic>viz.</italic> Period I (1996-97 to 2007-08), Period II (2008-09 to 2019-20) and overall period (1996-97 to 2019-20).</p>
<p>Based on quantity of average share of export of different vegetable products, 7 major vegetable products <italic>viz.</italic> (1) Onion fresh or chilled, (2) Onion dried/sliced/broken/ powder, (3) Potato other than Seed (fresh or chilled) (4) Cucumber prepared or preserved, (5) Cucumber provisionally preserved, (6) Tomato fresh or chilled, (7) Tomato Ketchup &#x0026; sauces were selected for the analysis.</p>
<p>The compound growth rate was obtained by fitting a straight line to the logarithms of the data and estimating the slope of the line (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">Acharya <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>), as given below:</p>
<sec>
<title>Compound growth rate</title>
<p>The compound growth rates (CGRs) of export of vegetable products from India was calculated by using the exponential function of the following specification:
<disp-formula id="FD1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Where,</p>
<p><italic>Y<sub>t</sub></italic> = Dependent variable (Export quantity/ export value); <italic>t</italic> = Time variable in years taking the value of 1, 2, 3,..., <italic>n; a</italic> = Intercept; <italic>b</italic> = Regression coefficient (1 + <italic>r</italic>).</p>
<p>For the purpose of estimation, the equation is expressed in logarithmic form.
<disp-formula id="FD2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The value of log b in equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD2">2</xref>) was computed using the formula,
<disp-formula id="FD3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Where,</p>
<p><italic>N</italic> = Number of years.</p>
<p>Subsequently, the compound growth rate (%) was computed using the formula,
<disp-formula id="FD4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left right left right left right left right left right left" columnspacing="0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em" rowspacing="3pt"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x00A0;Compound growth rate&#x00A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi></mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x00A0;Antilog of&#x00A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi></mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2217;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Student &#x2018;t&#x2019; test was used to determine the significance of the growth rates obtained for which, the following formula was employed,
<disp-formula id="FD5"><label>(5)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="FD6"><label>(6)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>log</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2217;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2217;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2217;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:msqrt></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The calculated &#x2018;<italic>t</italic>&#x2019; values, from equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD6">6</xref>), was compared with the table &#x2018;<italic>t</italic>&#x2019; values and the level of significance was tested for 1 and 5 per cent, probability levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Instability analysis</title>
<p>In order to study variability in export trade of vegetable products, an index of instability index was used as a measure of variability. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated by using the following formula:
<disp-formula id="FD7"><label>(7)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="false">&#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&#x2217;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>The tendency factor was tested for its consequence. Whenever, the tendency factor was found to be noteworthy, the dissimilarity around the tendency rather than variation around mean was used as an index of instability. The formula suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R4">Cuddy and Della (1978)</xref> was used to calculate the notch of dissimilarity around the tendency.
<disp-formula id="FD8"><label>(8)</label><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="block"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">&#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Where, <italic>Ix</italic> is Instability Index, <italic>CV</italic> = Coefficient of variation, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = Adjusted coefficient of multiple determination.</p>
<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">Das <italic>et al</italic>. (2016)</xref> for assessment of risk factor in growth rate there are range between (0 to &#x003E;10) which are likely as; Low growth rate (0 to 5), Medium growth rate (&#x003E;5 to 10) and High growth rate (&#x003E;10).</p>
<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">Sihmar, (2014)</xref> for assessment of risk factor in instability analysis there are range between (0 to &#x003E;30) which are likely as; Low instability (0 to 15), Medium instability (15 to 30) and High instability (&#x003E;30).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
<sec>
<title>Commodity-wise growth rates of vegetable products</title>
<p>It can be seen form <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> that the growth rates of quantity and value of vegetable products exported were positive and significant during both the periods as well as in the overall period, except in case of the export quantity of cucumber and tomato fresh or chilled during Period-II.</p>
<p>Further, it can be revealed that per unit export price of onion fresh or chilled, cucumber, tomato fresh as well as tomato ketchup increased significantly during Period-II. The rosy picture of these commodities should be taken into consideration by the exporters and policy makers. Similarly, probable reasons for significant decline in per unit price of onion dried/ sliced/broken/powder and potato other than seeds (fresh or chilled) during the entire period of study should be explored.</p>
<p>It can also be observed from the results that the compound growth rates of onion fresh or chilled export from India during Period-I were found positive and highly significant in case of quantity (15.72%) and value (17.88%), while it was negative (-1.31%) for export price. During PeriodII, export quantity (0.68%), export value (4.30%) and export price (3.59%) of onion fresh or chilled were positively significant at 1 per cent level of significance. The increase in growth of price in Period-II may be due to decrease in export quantity to meet risen domestic demand. During PeriodIII, the pattern of the compound growth rate was similar to the pattern as observed in Period-I. The compound growth rate of quantity (8.69) and value (15.02%) observed positive and highly significant. while, negative growth rate was observed in export price (-1.55%).</p>
<p>The annual compound growth rates of exports of onion dried/sliced/broken/powder reported positive and significant in case of both export quantity (24.54%) and export value (21.78%), but the rate of export price (-5.26%) showed a negative growth during Period-I. The similar pattern was observed during Period-II, where the positive growth rate in both export quantity (5.45%) and export value (11.38%) noticed significant. But the export price (-2.04%) showed a negative growth rate. During overall period, growth rate in export quantity (13.28%) found positive and significant, but in case of export value (19.21%), it was non- significant, whereas for export price, the growth rate (-2.10%) was negative.</p>
<p>The results of annual compound growth rates of export of potato other than seeds depicted a positive trend in both export quantity (19.11%) and export value (18.46%) and found significant at 10 per cent level of significance, whereas growth rate of export price (-3.65%) was negative during Period-I. During Period-II, it also registered positive growth rate in both export quantity (10.36%) and export value (18.09%) but the growth rate was negative in case of export price (-0.75%). During overall period also, it registered positive growth rate in both export quantity (17.41%) and export value (23.86%) whereas, negative growth rate was realized for export price (-1.87%). In all the periods, export quantity and export value had positive growth, but export price witnessed negative growth. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R9">Kavita <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref> also observed similar trend in their study on mango export from India. The results of cucumber prepared or preserved reflects a positive and significant growth in both export quantity (26.12%) and export value (26.43%) whereas, negative growth rate for export price (-2.88%) were observed during Period-I. During Period-II, it registered negative growth rate in export quantity (-4.79%) whereas, the growth rate was positive and highly significant in both export value (4.92%) and export price (2.22%). The higher growth rate in both export volume and export value were noticed during Period-I and Overall period, but in Period-II, it declined significantly due to tough competition faced by Indian exporters in international market and also due to significant increase in domestic production of cucumber prepared or preserved. During the overall period, it also registered positive and significant growth rate in both export quantity (9.87%) and export value (16.36%). Whereas, export price(-1.48%) registered a negativelysignificant growth rate.</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Commodity-wise growth rates of major vegetable products export from India</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="EA-66-03-0363-t001.jp"/>
</table-wrap>
<p>The pattern of the compound growth rate of cucumber provisionally preserved was similar to the pattern of cucumber prepared or preserved as observed in all the periods. Similar growth pattern was observed during Period-I and Overall period, whereas negative growth rate was realized for export quantity during Period-II.</p>
<p>The results of annual compound growth rates of export of tomato fresh or chilled observed a positive and significant trend in export quantity (57.22%), export value (64.39%) and export price (1.29%) during Period-I. During Period-II, it registered a negative growth rate in export quantity (-5.69%), whereas, the growth rate was positive in both export value (1.90%) and export price (0.22%) and the export price was significant at 1 per cent level of significance. During Overall Period, it registered positive growth rate in both export quantity (30.68%) and export value (39.60%), whereas, export price (-0.61%) registered significantly declining rate.</p>
<p>Tomato Ketchup or sauce registered a positive growth rate in export quantity (8.22%), export value (13.18%) and export price (1.31%). Which were significant respectively at 10 and 1 per cent, level of significance during Period-I. During Period-II, positive and significant growth rate was observed in export quantity (2.47%), export value (10.81%) and export price (0.30%). But in Period-II, the growth rate was found decreased in export quantity (2.47%). This may be due to increase in demand in domestic area. During overall period, the positive growth rate was observed for export quantity (14.40%) and export value (20.32%) and export price was declined significantly at the rate of&#x2212;2.16 per cent per annum. These results are in conformity with the findings obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8">Karthick <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref> in their study on export of Ginger from India.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Instability analysis in export of major vegetable products</title>
<p>The results showed that all vegetable products exports, registered high instability except onion fresh or chilled (export quantity) during Period-I. The instability in vegetable products export quantity was higher in Period-II as compared to Period-I. In case of export price, the instability ranged from 13.06 to 30.15 during Period-I (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>During Period-II, the instability in export quantity, value and price, respectively ranged from the 13.78 to 66.09, 23.10 to 70.94 and 13.18 to 39.54. During overall period, the instability in vegetable products&#x2019; export ranged from 31.85 to 98.32, 29.19 to 103.23 and 14.71 to 43.08, respectively in case of quantity, value and price. Tomato fresh or chilled and tomato ketchup or sauce in both export quantity and export value showed high instability. Whereas tomato fresh or chilled and tomato ketchup or sauce are the most unstable commodity in terms of export quantity and export value. During Period I, the lowest instability in terms of export quantity was observed in onion fresh or chilled <italic>i.e.</italic> 27.84 per cent, whereas, 35.76 and 13.06 per cent in cucumber provisionally preserved in terms of export value and export price, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Instability analysis of vegetable products export from India</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="EA-66-03-0363-t002.jp"/>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth v/s instability of major vegetable products exports from India</p>
</caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="EA-66-03-0363-t003.jp"/>
</table-wrap>
<p>During Period-II, the lowest instability in terms of export quantity and export value were observed in cucumber prepared or preserved <italic>i.e.</italic> 13.78 and 23.10 per cent, respectively, whereas in case of export price the lowest instability was observed in cucumber provisionally preserved (13.18%). The result are in the line of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R5">Das <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref> in their study on export of Marine products.</p>
<p>In case of overall period, the lowest instability in terms of export quantity was observed in onion fresh or chilled <italic>i.e.</italic> 32.67 per cent, whereas, the lowest instability in export value and export price were observed in cucumber prepared or preserved and cucumber provisionally preserved about 29.19 and 14.71 per cent, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>As furnished in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>, it can be observed that in case of export quantity onion fresh or chilled, cucumber prepared or preserved and cucumber provisionally preserved were found in medium growth and high instability. This implies that, none of the product were found in desirable situation of low instability and high growth. In case of export price the majority of the vegetable products were placed into high growth with high instability, which indicates that, none of the vegetable products in any countries were found to be placed in desirable situation during the study period. In case of vegetable products export price Onion fresh or chilled and tomato ketchup or sauce were placed in low growth with high instability, onion dried/ sliced/broken/powder, potato other than seeds (fresh or chilled), cucumber prepared or preserved and tomato fresh or chilled were placed in low growth with medium instability, while cucumber provisionally preserved was placed in low growth with low instability, the result indicates that none of the countries reported to have desirable situation of high growth with low instability in case of export price of vegetable products.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CONCLUSION</title>
<p>The analysis of the rate of growth in export of vegetable products revealed that annual compound growth rates of Indian export for all the vegetable products under study were found significant for both the periods and also for the overall period. None of the vegetable were found to be stable in the export during the entire period of study. The main reason for higher instability in vegetable products price is due to drastic fluctuation in domestic price of vegetable products and hence, export is fluctuated over the time as higher domestic price leads to reduce the competitiveness in international trade. The other reason for high instability in vegetable products exports is due to the establishment of WTO which encouraged the entry of more numbers of countries in international trade. The trade liberalization took place after the entry of WTO led to increase in competition between the countries and because of that, availability of quality products increased at lower price. The policy makers and vegetable products traders should make intensive effort to overcome the bottlenecks in export of vegetable products so as to assume the consistency in world trade of vegetable products.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="R1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Acharya</surname>, <given-names>S.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Basavaraja</surname>, <given-names>H.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kunnal</surname>, <given-names>L.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Mahajanashetti</surname>, <given-names>S.B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Bhat</surname>, <given-names>R.S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Growth in Area, Production and Productivity of Major Crops in Karnataka</article-title>. <source>Karnataka J. Agril. Sci</source>., <volume>25</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>431</fpage>-<lpage>436</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R2"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>NHB</collab>. <year>2019</year>. <source>Horticulture Statistics at a Glance Database</source>. Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.nhb.gov.in">www.nhb.gov.in</ext-link>. (<date-in-citation>Last Accessed on: 15th February, 2020</date-in-citation>)</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R3"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>CACP</collab>. <year>2020</year>. <source>Commission for Agricultural Costs &#x0026; Prices</source>. Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cacp.dacnet.nic.in">www.cacp.dacnet.nic.in</ext-link>. (<date-in-citation>Last Accessed on: 26th April, 2020</date-in-citation>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cuddy</surname>, <given-names>J.D.A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Della</surname>, <given-names>V.P.A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>1978</year>. <article-title>Measuring the instability of time series data</article-title>. <source>Oxford J. Econ. Stat.,</source> <volume>40</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>79</fpage>-<lpage>85</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Das</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>N.R.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Rani</surname>, <given-names>P.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Growth, Instability and Forecast of Marine Products Export from India</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. of Fish</source>, <volume>63</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>112</fpage>-<lpage>117</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R6"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>FAO</collab>. <year>2020</year>. <source>Food and Agriculture Organization</source>. Disponible at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org">www.fao.org</ext-link>. (<date-in-citation>Last Accessed on 2nd May, 2020</date-in-citation>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R7"><mixed-citation publication-type="web"><collab>IIVR</collab>. <year>2020</year>. <source>Indian Institute of Vegetable Research</source>. Disponible at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.iivr.gov.in">www.iivr.gov.in</ext-link>. (<date-in-citation>Last Accessed on 21st January, 2020</date-in-citation>).</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Karthick</surname>, <given-names>V.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Alagumani</surname>, <given-names>T.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Anbarassan</surname>, <given-names>A.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Growth and export performance of ginger in India &#x2013; An economic analysis</article-title>. <source>Eco. Affairs,</source> <volume>60</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>207</fpage>-<lpage>214</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kavita</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Chahal</surname>, <given-names>V.P.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>S.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Dynamics of Indian fresh mango export</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. Agril. Sci.,</source> <volume>85</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>1466</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R10"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Neeraj</surname>, <given-names>K.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Akshay</surname>, <given-names>C.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vinita</surname>, <given-names>B.</given-names></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Vishal</surname>, <given-names>J.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Marketing and Production of Fruits and Vegetables in India</article-title><source>. Int. J. Current Microbio. and Appl. Sci</source>., <volume>6</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>2896</fpage>-<lpage>2907</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R11"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sahni</surname></string-name> and <string-name><surname>Kumari</surname></string-name></person-group>, <year>2019</year>. <article-title>Current Status of Vegetables in India</article-title>. <source>Biotech and Sci.,</source> <volume>5</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>11</fpage>-<lpage>15</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="R12"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sihmar</surname>, <given-names>R.</given-names></string-name></person-group> <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Growth and Instability in Agricultural Production in Haryana: A District level Analysis</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Sci. and Res. Publ</source>., <volume>4</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>12</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>